Digital Currency and Monetary Policy in the South African Economy: Praxis of Financial Dualism and Suggestion for Nigerians

Main Article Content

Suoye Igoni
J. U. J. Onwumere
Praise Woroma Amaewhule

Abstract

The acceptance of digital currency transactions by many African countries seems to be relatively low to enhance a cashless economy spurs the need for this study. This study aims to identify the impact of digital currency operations and suggest Nigerians cashless policy management. The study tests the praxis of financial dualism for digital currency and monetary policy in the South African economy. The Market capitalization (Mcap) and Volume (Vol) of crypto-currency, and monetary policy rate (MPR) of fourth-month ending quarterly information were extracted from Central Bank Digital Currency and the South Africa Reserve Bank around April 2013 to December 2019. The Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root and the Autoregressive Distributive Lag tests were conducted. The ADF unit root test results were not stationary at level but became stationary at the first level difference. Furthermore, the results of the ARDL indicated no positive and significant relationships between Market Capitalization and Volume of crypto-currency and monetary policy in the South African economy. However, positive and significant relationships exist in monetary policy in the South African economy.  The study then concluded that (Mcap) and (Vol) of digital currency did not constitute the significant variables of policy to influence the monetary policies in the South African economy, hence they operate independently. The study then concluded that a decision to adopt and regulate digital currency operation or not in Nigeria does not affect. The study, therefore, recommends the Nigerian to embrace the digital environment in terms of regulations for tax advantage.

Keywords:
Digital currency, monetary policy, South Africa, financial dualism, and, ARDL.

Article Details

How to Cite
Igoni, S., Onwumere, J. U. J., & Amaewhule, P. W. (2020). Digital Currency and Monetary Policy in the South African Economy: Praxis of Financial Dualism and Suggestion for Nigerians. Asian Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 2(1), 49-57. Retrieved from https://www.globalpresshub.com/index.php/AJEFM/article/view/823
Section
Original Research Article

References

Myint H. Economic theory and the underdeveloped countries. New York: Oxford University Press. 1971;315-347.

Bordo DM, Levin TA. Central Bank digital currency and the future of monetary policy. NBER Working Paper. 2017;23711.

Benigno P. Monetary policy in a world of cryptocurrency. VOX CEPR Policy Portal; 2019.

Meaning J, Dyson B, Barker J, Clayton E. Broadening narrow money: Momentary policy with a central bank digital currency. Bank of England Working Paper. 2018; 724.

Boeke JH. Economics and economic policy of dual societies. New York Institute of Pacific Relations; 1956.

Berentsen A. Monetary policy implications of digital money. Kyklos International Review for Social Sciences. 2008;51(1).

Niepelt D. Digital money and central bank digital currency: An executive summary for policymakers. VOX, CEPR Policy Portal; 2020.

Pieters GC. The potential impact of decentralized virtual currency on monetary policy. Federal Reserve Bank Dallas; Globalization and Monetary policy Institute Annual Report; 2016.

Rahman JA. Deflationary policy under digital and fiat currency competition. Research in economics. 2018;72(2):171-180.

Nelson B. Financial stability and monetary policy issues associated with digital currencies. Journal of Economics and Business. 2018;76-78.

Mohammad S, Davoodalhosseini R. Central bank digital currency and monetary policy. Staff Working Paper. 2018;36.

Beniak P. Central bank digital currency and monetary policy: A literature review. Munich Personal RePEc. 2019;96663.

Onwumere JUJ. Business & economics research methods; Enugu: Vougasen Ltd, 2nd Ed; 2009.

Neter J, Wasseraman N, Kutner MH. Applied linear regression models. Richard D. Iwin Inc USA, 4th Ed; 1989.

Dickey DA, Fuller WA. Distribution of estimators for time series regression with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association. 1976;74:427-431.

Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2001;16(3):289–326.